That less diameter for 737 max was due to Ground Clearance . The 787 too has a low ground clearance But, it doesn’t have a sacrificed diameter as you can see in the max.
Beiträge von BoeingIFY_8
-
-
Is it going to be a freeware or a payware. I don’t mind if I need to spend. Till now there’s no reliable A330s which I could fly in any sim, apart from toliss Neo.
-
I noticed that the 737-800 cockpit turns green when flying at night. Is it possible to fix this?
Same issue I have. Dev said they will test and fix this issue.
-
I've noticed in the Boeing 737 cockpit while using the beta version. I am not sure whether this is intended or not but i have never seen any "green" lights in the 737 cockpit at night. I am pretty sure that this was not a thing in the regular version. I'm not sure if this has already been reported or not. This green light is present in both the -800 and -900ER variants
Thanks again for your continued support and development – it's much appreciated!Have the same issues. Even with the 739ER.
-
Mm I see,
Wait, I think it’s the old airport Liuting airport (built in 90s and closed rn) which is currently in AF.
The one which you sent is the Jiaodong airport. (Current airport in Qingdao).
It’s strange, why is the ICAO code same for both of them. -
-
Since I’m experiencing performance issues with Aerofly FS on my iPad 2022 (4 GB RAM), I wanted to ask for your advice.
Which iPad model would you recommend to get the best possible performance, smooth experience, and full 3D buildings in the simulator — including clouds, lights, and complex aircraft like the A350 — without any lag?
Thank you in advance for your help!
Best regards
11th gen if you are tight in budget. after all, my budget iPad 8 gen still runs better without any issues only issues I have is in high airport density areas where it randomly crashes (understandable since it’s 3gb ram). I’m going to change to A16 in the coming months (more or less performs similar to IPhone 15.)
If you have more bucks to buy, go for (iPad Air M series ). M3/M2 is smth like pc should never disappoint your choice.
-
Understood. But it still appears when flying manually FD's on at 50ft, am wondering what the FD's are commanding. I'll bury my head in the fcom for a bit. Thanks for your help.
Same, but I get what IPACS said.
Actually, the A320s flare at 30ft but at first i thought to flare when fcom says to flare. -
No this is modeled accurately. The flare mode engages at 50ft and then starts with the flare at around 30-20ft. You can look at the flight director guidance if you want but it's not recommended to use it for manual landings. Your eyes should be outside at that point.
Oh I see, I got confused with the toliss showing on 30ft in it’s fcom. (Manual landing)
-
-
Engine view
Will we get the realistic XWB sounds? Or is it planned for the future?
-
The hydraulic system in the A320 is experimental and might be ripped out completely and be replaced with something different entirely. Doing the same for more aircraft than just the A320 family would be a waste of time right now. It's on the list for future expansions but not just for one aircraft, we need a solution for hydraulics that works on all aircraft.
So will we have realistic hydraulics in the future? For every aircrafts like a350,a320 and others?
-
Will we have realistic IRS aligning time at least in the A350?
Or, is it planned for the future? -
This is what the A350 front panel currently looks like in the developer build. There are a lot of new features shown here and I hope we can include all of them in the initial release but keep in mind that they are work in progress. Some things like the rendering of the airport tarmacs on the map may not be included in the initial release.
So, that airport maps spawns after touchdown? Or is it going To be static?
-
-
-
Looks promising, can’t wait for the release
will it have airport maps? Like I mean this: (my personal favourite feature in airbus)It appears after touchdown in real life.
-
The 787-8 has fewer flap positions, so some cockpit elements would need to be reworked.
Really? Don’t they look the same?
Edit: yes I can see their differences in numbers. The 9 and 10 seems to be the same but, why is 8 different? It’s because for better takeoff performance? -
Maybe IPACS removed the moon to improve performance. Personally, it annoys me that things we already had are secretly removed again, just like the taxi light
What does moon have to do with performance?
I can agree for buildings, aircraft and texture quality. But, what does it do for performance issues? -
No it was definitely bigger that 2023's version
Mm i think it should be a little bit larger. But anyways it looks good
But, why does it look like lunar eclipse?. I’ve noticed that moon colour looks a bit reddish.