"Dear developer and creator can you make a320neo and a321neo in the next Aerofly update it's my favorite
"
Do the A320neo and 737 MAX share the same engine sounds?
"Dear developer and creator can you make a320neo and a321neo in the next Aerofly update it's my favorite
"
Do the A320neo and 737 MAX share the same engine sounds?
I noticed that too! The whole of Spain now has extremely high resolution scenery.
Most of Europe was already high quality, but it's even better now? I couldn't really tell lol
Am I crazy or is there new satellite imagery for most of the world with the latest update?
It’s not America or Europe level but it’s a great improvement
Hong Kong’s third runway is complete!
Osaka RJBB is still underwater
I’m kindly following up as I’m still waiting for a response both on the forum and via email. This bug is preventing me from using or purchasing the 737-800 in Aerofly FS Global. I would really appreciate assistance from the support team. Thank you!
The support team is asleep. They’re based in Europe. Check back again in 12 hours.
No need to post it multiple times on the forum.
You think that the devs will fix the bug?
Do you really believe the devs will leave it this way?
IPACS, thank you for the massive 70+ liveries on the 737-800. Amazing job, especially with the variety and including complex special liveries.
This is obviously the most liveries out of any aircraft, and sometimes it can get annoying to tap up to 35 times (or more if you went the wrong way) to get to the livery you want.
Is it time to add a livery search function? Or maybe a new UI that can quickly scroll through liveries?
Shouldn’t the bottom winglet also be blue?
The latest beta today 1.5.3 (1105) is anyone else unable to search for airports using their device keyboard in the location menu on Aerofly’s home page?
I can only use Aerofly’s provided keypad
I also received the update and experienced the same. Not sure what distance was changed compared to yesterday.
The current rendering distance is very suitable, taking into account both mobile performance and balancing game frame rate. Well done!
Updated today :01.05.03.08
Its because of posts like these that I want the devs to add render distance options. I haven't done a flight since the update, but if they actually did reduce the distance in beta I also want them to revert it back to a greater distance. Though, I know there are many that prefer the balance, hence my point.
This is New York City at night in the latest beta 1.5.3. Completely unacceptable for Aerofly.
I get that some don’t care, but others have expressed their disappointment. For some, including me, the original render distance had no negative impact on our devices. Now we’re unfairly penalized to accommodate weaker devices, which is why render distance options should be the best solution.
Pointe-a-Pitre (TFFR) It's great
What’s interesting is these automatically generated airports still have blue/green taxi lights while many custom-built airports do not.
The rendering distance for scenery and city night lights has also been reduced
Previous beta version had no problem
I hope this is a mistake. Night flying is very ugly again.
MUCH better. I've avoided airports like Atlanta for a while because of this very reason
Same here. Looking forward to release.
Got any pictures of Doha and Abu Dhabi?
Alles anzeigenOne step further into a fully global experience. The airports generate well from the ones I selected
Some airports like moscow have the buildings but not the boarding bridges or the parked aircraft. Perhaps making it consistent would be a good next update for the generation
Wow. That explains why we haven't gotten any new 3D airports recently. Sure it's automatically generated but that's better than flat land.
Alles anzeigenHello!
I'd like to suggest a change to the Sichuan Airlines A320. As you can see below, in Aerofly it has sharklets, but this specific A320 – registration B-6732 – has wing fences in real life, not sharklets.
To avoid too much work, I suggest simply changing the registration number on the fuselage to one of Sichuan's A320s that actually has sharklets (for example, B-8331).
Additionally, the Airbus logo near the nose of the aircraft is not accurate — in real life, it only displays the text "AIRBUS A320" without the manufacturer’s symbol.
Many livery mistakes have been reported, and I believe this one has already, but none have been fixed in over 3.5 years. Sadly it does not seem to be a priority.
Ipacs tell us what are you working on and people will stop asking, we promise we wont ask for teasers.
It’s like an addiction. If IPACS tells you what they’re working on, people will ask more and more about it until it’s released
Can you reproduce this? Does it show every time?
I am using the latest iOS beta (1.5.2) and Hong Kong consistently still has the pole on the runway.
Even doing a flight where I spawn my aircraft 10 minutes out from landing also generated the pole and the broken terminal.
1. A350, no competition
2. A321 (IAE engines only)
3. 737 MAX
I have to wonder how good the 787 would be if IPACS made it now versus 4 years ago, it’s kind of slacking compared to the A350 lol
We're simply updating the liveries over time to keep them realistic and relevant. The old files no longer exist and it would be very confusing for users and a lot of storage space wasted for such small differences.
Hold on, I remember you saying liveries do not take up much storage.
I can’t find that thread now because so many have been deleted but I remember that….